Science
The scientific foundation of the KIMERO Index
The KIMERO Index is built on established constructs from organisational and motivation research. This page shows which source stands behind which dimension, and where a foundation still needs to be added rather than invented.
The three dimensions
Context factors
Autonomy and task complexity are captured in addition, using the Work Design Questionnaire. They are not factored into the KIMERO Index; they're reported separately. They explain why the same recommendation can play out differently for two teams, for example when one team works considerably more autonomously or handles more complex tasks than the other.
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356.
How answers become a value between 0 and 100
All items are measured on a 7-point scale (1 = not true at all, 7 = fully true), averaged per metric, and linearly mapped onto a 0–100 scale. Metrics are averaged into dimensions, and dimensions into the KIMERO Index. Results only appear once a minimum number of responses is reached, so no individual result ever becomes visible.
The complete instrument definition (all items, weights, formula) is part of the KIMERO project and continues to evolve as our understanding grows.
Context factors such as autonomy and task complexity are reported separately and are not factored into the KIMERO Index.
State of the research
The constructs used here are scientifically established and backed by real sources. The concrete KIMERO survey instrument itself is under active development. This is deliberately not a claim of a finished, published validation study, but a transparently reasoned, evolving foundation.

